System of precedent as law essay

by the decided, whereby lower courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases and appellate courts follow their own previous decisions. Some courts in this rank are the Magistrates court, the Youth court, the Coroners court and the County court. This is an obiter dictum. This is the ratio and Lord Atkins Neighbour Test was obiter. When a judge made a decision, a private freelance reporter would note the decision (often incorrectly) and distribute it to other judges and attorneys for a fee, so they could try to, more or less, maintain consistent goldsmiths creative writing short course rulings across the kingdom. "Common law" also makes the law basically unknown and unknowable to the common people, who have no way to look up case rulings, no way to interpret them, and no way to guarantee that they are still valid. The Nature of Precedent Essay.some degree of certainty of law is essential. My first point is on the Hierarchy of the courts. The doctrine of judicial binding precedent, concerns itself with the importance of case law. My second point is Stare Decisis and what. By investing higher courts with the authority to make binding rulings, the legal system as a whole was granted a more or less consistent system of "law" that was fairly resistant to change. Judicial, precedent, the weight or authority of rules of law derived from cases may vary. The hierarchy of the courts The English system is made up of a hierarchy of courts. Judicial precedent is based upon the Latin maxim "stare decisis" which loosely translates into "stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established". More importantly, how the law applies to these facts is scrutinised. The Court of Appeal must also follow its own previous decisions. The second type of precedents will not be delved into any further at this point. The lowest court of law in England and Wales, which deals with less serious crimes, is the Magistrates Court. The court of last resort and the highest appellate court is the Supreme Court (formerly, the House of Lords ). This is called stare decisis or let the decision stand. Decisions of courts lower in the hierarchy. The legal principle to be derived from the judges decision on the basis of facts regarded by the judge as a material known as ratio decidendi. There are two court systems, criminal and civil, and they both contain various appeal routes in a vertical court structure. Case law is used to describe the collection of reported decisions of the courts, and the principles which stem from them. Precedent : Stare Decisis - Stand by the Decision The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis, this means that like cases should be treated alike. In English law it is usually created by the decision of a higher court, such as the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. As a result, judges were forced into making up the rules as they went along, since there were no comprehensive legal codes to guide them. Miles Kighton put it rather more cynically in Punch: A trick which has been tried before, successfully. There are areas of both criminal and civil law that have not been codified by Parliament. Whether the facts of the current case come within in the scope. Judicial Precedent in the English Legal System Essay.The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis which means to stand by what has been decided. Judicial Precedent Essay.equal status or higher where the legal principle established is the same and the facts or points of law are sufficiently similar every court is In England and Wales the courts operate a very rigid doctrine of precedent which has the effect that.

The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on one of the most fundamental aspects of any legal system and that. And Judicial Precedent works great, for which he gives the reason ratio decidendi. The general rule is that all courts are bound to follow decisions made by courts higher than themselves in the hierarchy and appellate courts are usually bound. The doctrine of judicial precedent has always played a preeminent system of precedent as law essay role in English law. This doctrine of precedent is extremely strong in English law as it ensures fairness and consistency and it highlights the importance of case law in our legal system. Judicial Precedent Negligence Essay, all like cases must be treated alike.

Decisions in the higher courts bind the lower courts. But must also be followed, the maintenance of this practice should be described in order to discuss its value. Things said by the way, the binding part of a previous decision language is the ratio decidendi reason for the decision and it must be followed by judges in later cases.

Judges are bound by the law of binding precedents in England and Wales and other common law jurisdictions.

This essay has been submitted by a law student.
This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.
As the doctrine of precedent is an essential part of English legal system, knowing how it works is also undeniably important.

This essay will discuss the operation of precedent within the English legal system and the important role that is played by the court hierarchy and law.
The doctrine of precedent is usually defined by the Latin phrase, which has formed the doctrine of precedent as it stands now: stare decisis et non.
This allows lawyers to advise their clients with some certainty as to their position and whether to take a case to court.

A judgement may be extremely long and it is for lawyers and judges in future cases to work out the ratio decidendi.
There may be differing opinions on what the ratio is and what the obiter.
The general principle in common law legal systems is that similar cases should be decided so as to give similar and predictable outcomes, and the principle of precedent is the mechanism by which that goal is attained.